FirePro S7150 vs Radeon HD 6770M

Place in the ranking	832	459
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.59
Power efficiency	4.90	4.48
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	Whistler	Tonga
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	4 January 2011 (13 years ago)	1 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$2,399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	480	2048
Core clock speed	725 MHz	920 MHz
Number of transistors	716 million	5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	17.40	117.8
Floating-point processing power	0.696 TFLOPS	3.768 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	24	128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	57.6 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.0	6.3
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6770M 2.50

FirePro S7150 9.79
+292%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6770M 964

FirePro S7150 3770
+291%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	23 −291%	90−95 +291%
Full HD	24 −275%	90−95 +275%
1200p	12 −275%	45−50 +275%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

26.66

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6
−260%

18−20

+260%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −286%	27−30 +286%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −275%	45−50 +275%
Hitman 3	7−8 −286%	27−30 +286%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −275%	75−80 +275%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −264%	40−45 +264%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −278%	140−150 +278%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −286%	27−30 +286%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −275%	45−50 +275%
Hitman 3	7−8 −286%	27−30 +286%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −275%	75−80 +275%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −264%	40−45 +264%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −285%	50−55 +285%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −278%	140−150 +278%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −275%	45−50 +275%
Hitman 3	7−8 −286%	27−30 +286%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −275%	75−80 +275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −264%	40−45 +264%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −285%	50−55 +285%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −278%	140−150 +278%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
−250%

21−24

+250%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Hitman 3	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −286%	27−30 +286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −257%	50−55 +257%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
−250%

21−24

+250%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
−250%

14−16

+250%

This is how HD 6770M and FirePro S7150 compete in popular games:

FirePro S7150 is 291% faster in 900p
FirePro S7150 is 275% faster in 1080p
FirePro S7150 is 275% faster in 1200p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.50	9.79
Recency	4 January 2011	1 February 2016
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	150 Watt

HD 6770M has 328.6% lower power consumption.

FirePro S7150, on the other hand, has a 291.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro S7150 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6770M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6770M is a notebook card while FirePro S7150 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.