Mobility Radeon HD 5470 vs HD 6770

Place in performance ranking	708	1161
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.24	0.06
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	Juniper	Park XT
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	21 January 2011 (13 years ago)	7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$129	no data
Current price	$150 (1.2x MSRP)	$94

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 6770 has 300% better value for money than ATI Mobility HD 5470.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	800	80
Core clock speed	no data	750 MHz
Boost clock speed	900 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,040 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	13-15 Watt
Texture fill rate	34.00	6.000
Floating-point performance	1,360.0 gflops	120 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 6770 and Mobility Radeon HD 5470 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCIe 2.0 x16	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	198 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR2, GDDR2, DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1050 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	25.6 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Eyefinity	1	no data
HDMI	+	no data
DisplayPort support	-	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	no data
CrossFire	1	no data
Enduro	-	no data
HD3D	-	no data
PowerTune	-	no data
TrueAudio	-	no data
ZeroCore	-	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 11	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.0
OpenGL	4.4	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	no data	N/A
Mantle	-	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6770 3.23
+430%

ATI Mobility HD 5470 0.61

HD 6770 outperforms Mobility HD 5470 by 430% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 6770 1249
+429%

ATI Mobility HD 5470 236

HD 6770 outperforms Mobility HD 5470 by 429% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

+367%

3−4
−367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Hitman 3	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +400%	12−14 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Hitman 3	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +400%	12−14 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +400%	12−14 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Hitman 3	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%