ATI Radeon X1650 PRO vs HD 6750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6750 and Radeon X1650 PRO, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6750
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 86 Watt
2.52
+1160%

HD 6750 outperforms ATI X1650 PRO by a whopping 1160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8541433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.15no data
Power efficiency2.230.35
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameJuniperRV530
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date21 January 2011 (14 years ago)1 February 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores720no data
Core clock speedno data600 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,040 million157 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)86 Watt44 Watt
Texture fill rate25.202.400
Floating-point processing power1.008 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs364
L1 Cache72 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 119.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 6750 2.52
+1160%
ATI X1650 PRO 0.20

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6750 Samples: 755 1056
+1157%
ATI X1650 PRO Samples: 52 84

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.52 0.20
Recency 21 January 2011 1 February 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 86 Watt 44 Watt

HD 6750 has a 1160% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1650 PRO, on the other hand, has 95.5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 6750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1650 PRO in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6750
Radeon HD 6750
ATI Radeon X1650 PRO
Radeon X1650 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 296 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 69 votes

Rate Radeon X1650 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6750 or Radeon X1650 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.