ATI Radeon X800 PRO vs HD 6730M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6730M with Radeon X800 PRO, including specs and performance data.

HD 6730M
2011
1 GB GDDR3, 35 Watt
1.24
+727%

HD 6730M outperforms X800 PRO by a whopping 727% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10841486
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.720.24
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameWhistlerR423
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2011 (15 years ago)1 May 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speed725 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors716 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt48 Watt
Texture fill rate17.405.700
Floating-point processing power0.696 TFLOPSno data
ROPs812
TMUs2412
L1 Cache48 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz450 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p17
+750%
2−3
−750%
Full HD23
+1050%
2−3
−1050%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Valorant 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Valorant 3−4 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Valorant 6−7 0−1

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

This is how HD 6730M and ATI X800 PRO compete in popular games:

  • HD 6730M is 750% faster in 900p
  • HD 6730M is 1050% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 0.15
Recency 4 January 2011 1 May 2004
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 48 Watt

HD 6730M has a 726.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 225% more advanced lithography process, and 37.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 6730M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X800 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6730M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X800 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6730M
Radeon HD 6730M
ATI Radeon X800 PRO
Radeon X800 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon X800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6730M or Radeon X800 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.