RTX A2000 12 GB vs Radeon HD 6730M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6730M with RTX A2000 12 GB, including specs and performance data.

HD 6730M
2011
1 GB GDDR3, 35 Watt
1.30

RTX A2000 12 GB outperforms HD 6730M by a whopping 2518% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1022141
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data93.42
Power efficiency2.6835.06
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameWhistlerGA106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 January 2011 (14 years ago)23 November 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4803328
Core clock speed725 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors716 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate17.40124.8
Floating-point processing power0.696 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs24104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p17
−2253%
400−450
+2253%
Full HD23
−2509%
600−650
+2509%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data0.75

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−2456%
230−240
+2456%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Dota 2 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−2445%
280−290
+2445%
Fortnite 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−2456%
230−240
+2456%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−2233%
350−400
+2233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%
World of Tanks 27−30
−2486%
750−800
+2486%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Dota 2 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−2445%
280−290
+2445%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−2456%
230−240
+2456%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−2233%
350−400
+2233%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2400%
200−210
+2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
World of Tanks 8−9
−2400%
200−210
+2400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−2500%
130−140
+2500%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2500%
130−140
+2500%
Valorant 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−2500%
260−270
+2500%
Dota 2 16−18
−2400%
400−450
+2400%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−2233%
350−400
+2233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−2233%
350−400
+2233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−2500%
260−270
+2500%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Dota 2 16−18
−2400%
400−450
+2400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Valorant 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

This is how HD 6730M and RTX A2000 12 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 2253% faster in 900p
  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 2509% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.30 34.03
Recency 4 January 2011 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 70 Watt

HD 6730M has 100% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000 12 GB, on the other hand, has a 2517.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A2000 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6730M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6730M is a notebook card while RTX A2000 12 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6730M
Radeon HD 6730M
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
RTX A2000 12 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 144 votes

Rate RTX A2000 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.