GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 6720G2

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6720G2 and GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6720G2
2011
1.55
+1.3%

HD 6720G2 outperforms GTX 660M Mac Edition by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking993998
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.17
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameno dataGK107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)1 April 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores880384
Core clock speedno data950 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data30.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7296 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Fortnite 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Valorant 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Fortnite 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Valorant 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Valorant 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Valorant 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Valorant 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 1.53
Recency 14 June 2011 1 April 2013
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

HD 6720G2 has a 1.3% higher aggregate performance score.

GTX 660M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 6720G2 and GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6720G2
Radeon HD 6720G2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 12 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6720G2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 22 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6720G2 or GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.