GeForce MX230 vs Radeon HD 6670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6670 with GeForce MX230, including specs and performance data.

HD 6670
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 66 Watt
1.89

GeForce MX230 outperforms HD 6670 by a whopping 152% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking871611
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.081.61
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTurksN17S-G0
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date19 April 2011 (13 years ago)20 February 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99 no data
Current price$134 (1.4x MSRP)$1221

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GeForce MX230 has 1913% better value for money than HD 6670.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480256
Core clock speedno data1519 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1531 MHz
Number of transistors716 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)66 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2025.31
Floating-point performance768.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 6670 and GeForce MX230 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support-no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore-no data
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkanno data1.2.131
Mantle-no data
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6670 1.89
GeForce MX230 4.76
+152%

GeForce MX230 outperforms Radeon HD 6670 by 152% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 6670 730
GeForce MX230 1839
+152%

GeForce MX230 outperforms Radeon HD 6670 by 152% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 6670 1130
GeForce MX230 2468
+118%

GeForce MX230 outperforms Radeon HD 6670 by 118% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9−10
−156%
23
+156%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13
−131%
30−33
+131%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Battlefield 5 19
−137%
45−50
+137%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14
−150%
35−40
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Far Cry 5 14
−150%
35−40
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 17
−135%
40−45
+135%
Forza Horizon 4 21
−138%
50−55
+138%
Hitman 3 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%
Metro Exodus 18
−150%
45−50
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10
−140%
24−27
+140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Battlefield 5 13
−131%
30−33
+131%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 13
−131%
30−33
+131%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Far Cry 5 12
−150%
30−33
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 12
−150%
30−33
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 53
−145%
130−140
+145%
Hitman 3 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%
Metro Exodus 13
−131%
30−33
+131%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−133%
35−40
+133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6
−133%
14−16
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9
−133%
21−24
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Far Cry 5 7
−129%
16−18
+129%
Forza Horizon 4 12
−150%
30−33
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−133%
21−24
+133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Hitman 3 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Hitman 3 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%

This is how HD 6670 and GeForce MX230 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX230 is 156% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.89 4.76
Recency 19 April 2011 20 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 66 Watt 10 Watt

The GeForce MX230 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6670 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6670 is a desktop card while GeForce MX230 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6670
Radeon HD 6670
NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GeForce MX230

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 822 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1301 vote

Rate GeForce MX230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.