Radeon RX 6900 XT vs HD 6570M

Place in performance ranking	964	18
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.06	18.67
Architecture	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Capilano	Navi 21
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	26 November 2010 (13 years old)	8 December 2020 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999
Current price	$338	$957 (1x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6900 XT has 31017% better value for money than HD 6570M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	5120
Core clock speed	650 MHz	1825 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2250 MHz
Number of transistors	627 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.00	720.0
Floating-point performance	520.0 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 6570M and Radeon RX 6900 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3, GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	57.6 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.5
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6570M 1.38

RX 6900 XT 69.34
+4925%

RX 6900 XT outperforms HD 6570M by 4925% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 6570M 1067

RX 6900 XT 59119
+5441%

RX 6900 XT outperforms HD 6570M by 5441% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	24 −704%	193 +704%
1440p	2−3 −6600%	134 +6600%
4K	1−2 −8200%	83 +8200%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−3300%

130−140
+3300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	117
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −1822%	170−180 +1822%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3300%	130−140 +3300%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −28200%	283 +28200%
Hitman 3	2−3 −14050%	283 +14050%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −20400%	205 +20400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −4800%	196 +4800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −3071%	222 +3071%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	106
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −1822%	170−180 +1822%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3300%	130−140 +3300%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −27800%	279 +27800%
Hitman 3	2−3 −13700%	276 +13700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −17300%	174 +17300%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −8100%	164 +8100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −3000%	124 +3000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −2857%	207 +2857%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −7975%	323 +7975%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	98
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3300%	130−140 +3300%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −24700%	248 +24700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −4000%	164 +4000%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −4100%	120−130 +4100%
Hitman 3	4−5 −5225%	213 +5225%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −1411%	136 +1411%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	82
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −3080%	159 +3080%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −7300%	70−75 +7300%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −6600%	130−140 +6600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −6300%	120−130 +6300%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −3800%	75−80 +3800%
Hitman 3	1−2 −12700%	128 +12700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −443%	38 +443%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	55

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	68
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	66
Far Cry 5	3−4 −2633%	80−85 +2633%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1920%	101 +1920%

This is how HD 6570M and RX 6900 XT compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

RX 6900 XT is 704% faster than HD 6570M

1440p resolution:

RX 6900 XT is 6600% faster than HD 6570M

4K resolution:

RX 6900 XT is 8200% faster than HD 6570M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6900 XT is 28200% faster than the HD 6570M.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 6900 XT surpassed HD 6570M in all 32 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	1.38	69.34
Recency	26 November 2010	8 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	300 Watt