To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.
HD 8470D vs HD 6550D
- Interface IGP
- Core clock speed 600
- Max video memory System Shared
- Memory type System Shared
- Memory clock speed System Shared
- Maximum resolution
- Interface IGP
- Core clock speed 800
- Max video memory System Shared
- Memory type System Shared
- Memory clock speed System Shared
- Maximum resolution
General info
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
Place in performance rating | 963 | 982 |
Value for money | 0.18 | 0.05 |
Architecture | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) | Terascale 3 (2010−2013) |
GPU code name | Llano | Richland |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 30 June 2011 (11 years old) | 5 June 2013 (9 years old) |
Current price | $49 | $36 |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 400 | 128 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 800 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 850 MHz |
Number of transistors | 1000 Million | 1,303 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 12.00 | 10.20 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | IGP | IGP |
Width | IGP | IGP |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | System Shared |
Memory bus width | System Shared | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | System Shared |
Shared memory | + | + |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Passmark
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
Radeon HD 6550D outperforms Radeon HD 8470D by 14% in Passmark.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Radeon HD 6550D outperforms Radeon HD 8470D by 15% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
Radeon HD 6550D outperforms Radeon HD 8470D by 11% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 20
+53.8%
| 13
−53.8%
|
Popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating | 1.02 | 0.89 |
Recency | 30 June 2011 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 400 | 128 |
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends
since it shows better performance.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Radeon HD 6550D by NVIDIA
The nearest Radeon HD 6550D's NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce 810M, which is faster by 2% and higher by 8 positions in our performance rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon HD 6550D:
Competitors of Radeon HD 8470D by NVIDIA
According to our data, the nearest equivalent to Radeon HD 8470D by NVIDIA is GeForce 7950 GT, which is slower by 1% and lower by 4 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon HD 8470D:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.