NVIDIA GeForce 810M vs AMD Radeon HD 6550D

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rating	1006	999
Value for money	0.18	0.02
Architecture	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Llano	GF117
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	30 June 2011 (11 years old)	24 March 2014 (8 years old)
Current price	$51	$163

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	48
Core clock speed	600 MHz	738 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	950 MHz
Number of transistors	1000 Million	585 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	28 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)	65 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	12.00	5.904
Floating-point performance	no data	141.7 gflops

Dimensions and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 2.0 x16
Width	IGP	MXM Module

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	1 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

No outputs

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	no data	2.1

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

---

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

20

no data

Popular games

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Performance rating	1.02	1.04
Recency	30 June 2011	24 March 2014
Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	48
Chip lithography	32 nm	28 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)	65 Watt	15 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---