ATI Radeon 9700 vs HD 6540G2

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6540G2 with Radeon 9700, including specs and performance data.

HD 6540G2
2011
1.31
+836%

HD 6540G2 outperforms ATI 9700 by a whopping 836% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10311432
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.26
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameno dataR300
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)1 July 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speedno data275 MHz
Number of transistorsno data110 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data37 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.200
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataFloppy

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data270 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data17.28 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX119.0 (9_0)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Fortnite 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
World of Tanks 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
World of Tanks 7−8 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
Valorant 6−7 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Valorant 1−2 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.31 0.14
Recency 14 June 2011 1 July 2002
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

HD 6540G2 has a 835.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 6540G2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6540G2 is a notebook card while Radeon 9700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6540G2
Radeon HD 6540G2
ATI Radeon 9700
Radeon 9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6540G2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 11 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.