FireStream 9370 vs Radeon HD 6540G2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6540G2 with FireStream 9370, including specs and performance data.

HD 6540G2
2011
1.18

FireStream 9370 outperforms HD 6540G2 by a whopping 413% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1105640
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.07
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameno dataCypress
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 June 2011 (14 years ago)23 June 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4801600
Core clock speedno data825 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rateno data66.00
Floating-point processing powerno data2.64 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1150 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data147.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Fortnite 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Valorant 30−35
−385%
160−170
+385%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−400%
140−150
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Dota 2 16−18
−400%
80−85
+400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Fortnite 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Valorant 30−35
−385%
160−170
+385%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Dota 2 16−18
−400%
80−85
+400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Valorant 30−35
−385%
160−170
+385%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Valorant 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−400%
70−75
+400%
Valorant 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.18 6.05
Recency 14 June 2011 23 June 2010

HD 6540G2 has an age advantage of 11 months.

FireStream 9370, on the other hand, has a 412.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The FireStream 9370 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6540G2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6540G2 is a notebook graphics card while FireStream 9370 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6540G2
Radeon HD 6540G2
AMD FireStream 9370
FireStream 9370

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6540G2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 8 votes

Rate FireStream 9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6540G2 or FireStream 9370, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.