Radeon RX 7800 XT vs HD 6530M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6530M with Radeon RX 7800 XT, including specs and performance data.

HD 6530M
2010
1 GB DDR3, 26 Watt
1.28

RX 7800 XT outperforms HD 6530M by a whopping 4830% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking103230
Place by popularitynot in top-10084
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.95
Power efficiency3.4316.73
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCapilanoNavi 32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 November 2010 (14 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4003840
Core clock speed450 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2430 MHz
Number of transistors627 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt263 Watt
Texture fill rate9.000583.2
Floating-point processing power0.36 TFLOPS37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs20240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s624.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6530M 1.28
RX 7800 XT 63.11
+4830%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6530M 3334
RX 7800 XT 134322
+3929%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−5350%
218
+5350%
1440p2−3
−6000%
122
+6000%
4K1−2
−7200%
73
+7200%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.29
1440pno data4.09
4Kno data6.84

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−6350%
258
+6350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2867%
178
+2867%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2750%
110−120
+2750%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4725%
193
+4725%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11200%
110−120
+11200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−4933%
150−160
+4933%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−11400%
230−240
+11400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1967%
120−130
+1967%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1564%
230−240
+1564%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5800%
110−120
+5800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−3100%
250−260
+3100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−355%
150−160
+355%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−4250%
261
+4250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2750%
110−120
+2750%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3925%
161
+3925%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11200%
110−120
+11200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−4933%
150−160
+4933%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−11400%
230−240
+11400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1967%
120−130
+1967%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1564%
230−240
+1564%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5800%
110−120
+5800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−4875%
398
+4875%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1100%
130−140
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−355%
150−160
+355%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2067%
130
+2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2750%
110−120
+2750%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3600%
148
+3600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11200%
110−120
+11200%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−11000%
222
+11000%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1967%
120−130
+1967%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1857%
274
+1857%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−4150%
340
+4150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1718%
200
+1718%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−339%
145
+339%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5800%
110−120
+5800%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−13900%
140−150
+13900%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−4800%
95−100
+4800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−11800%
119
+11800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 70−75
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9600%
97
+9600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7200%
70−75
+7200%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−5325%
217
+5325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 147
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−3817%
230−240
+3817%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2525%
100−110
+2525%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 60−65

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−8800%
89
+8800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−7100%
72
+7100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 45−50
Far Cry 5 0−1 40−45

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2033%
60−65
+2033%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 222
+0%
222
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 181
+0%
181
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 158
+0%
158
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 124
+0%
124
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 148
+0%
148
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 243
+0%
243
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hitman 3 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+0%
118
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 44
+0%
44
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 164
+0%
164
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130
+0%
130
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 67
+0%
67
+0%

This is how HD 6530M and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is 5350% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT is 6000% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT is 7200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 13900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is ahead in 47 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.28 63.11
Recency 26 November 2010 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 263 Watt

HD 6530M has 911.5% lower power consumption.

RX 7800 XT, on the other hand, has a 4830.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6530M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6530M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6530M
Radeon HD 6530M
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 6530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2788 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.