Radeon RX 7600S vs HD 6530M

Place in the ranking	1116	141
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.41	38.21
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code name	Capilano	Navi 33
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	26 November 2010 (15 years ago)	4 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	1792
Core clock speed	450 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2200 MHz
Number of transistors	627 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	9.000	246.4
Floating-point processing power	0.36 TFLOPS	15.77 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	64
TMUs	20	112
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	28
L0 Cache	no data	448 KB
L1 Cache	40 KB	512 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	2 MB
L3 Cache	no data	32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.7
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 6530M 1.15

RX 7600S 37.22
+3137%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6530M 3334

RX 7600S 79339
+2280%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	3−4 −3267%	101 +3267%
1440p	1−2 −5100%	52 +5100%
4K	0−1	27

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−4250%

85−90
+4250%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	1−2 −12900%	130−140 +12900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −5050%	103 +5050%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −5450%	111 +5450%
Fortnite	3−4 −5367%	160−170 +5367%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −1971%	140−150 +1971%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 −14300%	144 +14300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −1556%	140−150 +1556%
Valorant	30−35 −591%	220−230 +591%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	1−2 −12900%	130−140 +12900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	27−30 −933%	270−280 +933%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −4100%	84 +4100%
Dota 2	16−18 −606%	113 +606%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −5250%	107 +5250%
Fortnite	3−4 −5367%	160−170 +5367%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −1971%	140−150 +1971%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 −13400%	135 +13400%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −1850%	39 +1850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −1556%	140−150 +1556%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −2550%	159 +2550%
Valorant	30−35 −591%	220−230 +591%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	1−2 −12900%	130−140 +12900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3400%	70 +3400%
Dota 2	16−18 −588%	110 +588%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −5000%	102 +5000%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −1971%	140−150 +1971%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −1556%	140−150 +1556%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −1483%	95 +1483%
Valorant	30−35 −459%	179 +459%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

3−4

−5367%

160−170
+5367%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	4−5 −1500%	64 +1500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	7−8 −3671%	260−270 +3671%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −1358%	170−180 +1358%
Valorant	2−3 −12600%	250−260 +12600%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	43
Far Cry 5	1−2 −9000%	90−95 +9000%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −3433%	100−110 +3433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

2−3

−4850%

95−100
+4850%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −479%	80−85 +479%
Valorant	6−7 −3733%	230−240 +3733%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2	0−1	100−110
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

2−3

−2300%

45−50
+2300%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	107 +0%	107 +0%

Full HD
Medium

Counter-Strike 2

191

+0%

191

+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike 2	127 +0%	127 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	126 +0%	126 +0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5

95−100

+0%

95−100

+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	17 +0%	17 +0%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18 +0%	18 +0%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

This is how HD 6530M and RX 7600S compete in popular games:

RX 7600S is 3267% faster in 1080p
RX 7600S is 5100% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7600S is 14300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 7600S performs better in 42 tests (72%)
there's a draw in 16 tests (28%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.15	37.22
Recency	26 November 2010	4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	75 Watt

HD 6530M has 188% lower power consumption.

RX 7600S, on the other hand, has a 3137% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 567% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600S is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6530M in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

4.2 258 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600S on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6530M or Radeon RX 7600S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.

Radeon RX 7600S vs HD 6530M

Aggregate performance score

Contents

Primary details

Detailed specifications

Form factor & compatibility

VRAM capacity and type

Connectivity and outputs

API and SDK support

Synthetic benchmarks

Combined synthetic benchmark score

3DMark Vantage Performance

Gaming performance

Average FPS across all PC games

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

Other comparisons

Community ratings

Comments