L20 vs Radeon HD 6530M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6530M with L20, including specs and performance data.

HD 6530M
2010
1 GB DDR3, 26 Watt
1.15

L20 outperforms HD 6530M by a whopping 2692% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1116188
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.418.99
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCapilanoAD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 November 2010 (15 years ago)16 November 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40011776
Core clock speed450 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors627 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate9.000927.4
Floating-point processing power0.36 TFLOPS59.35 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs20368
Tensor Coresno data368
Ray Tracing Coresno data92
L1 Cache40 KB11.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Fortnite 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2614%
190−200
+2614%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−2678%
250−260
+2678%
Valorant 30−35
−2556%
850−900
+2556%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−2678%
750−800
+2678%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Dota 2 16−18
−2400%
400−450
+2400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Fortnite 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2614%
190−200
+2614%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−2678%
250−260
+2678%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
Valorant 30−35
−2556%
850−900
+2556%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Dota 2 16−18
−2400%
400−450
+2400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2614%
190−200
+2614%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−2678%
250−260
+2678%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
Valorant 30−35
−2556%
850−900
+2556%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
−2614%
190−200
+2614%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−2400%
300−310
+2400%
Valorant 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−2400%
350−400
+2400%
Valorant 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.15 32.11
Recency 26 November 2010 16 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 275 Watt

HD 6530M has 958% lower power consumption.

L20, on the other hand, has a 2692% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The L20 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6530M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6530M is a notebook graphics card while L20 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 40 votes

Rate L20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6530M or L20, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.