A100 PCIe vs Radeon HD 6520G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1203not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.57no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameSumoGA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 December 2011 (13 years ago)22 June 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3206912
Core clock speed400 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate6.400609.1
Floating-point processing power0.256 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs8160
TMUs16432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared40 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared5120 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1215 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,555 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2011 22 June 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 250 Watt

HD 6520G has 614.3% lower power consumption.

A100 PCIe, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6520G and A100 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6520G is a notebook graphics card while A100 PCIe is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6520G
Radeon HD 6520G
NVIDIA A100 PCIe
A100 PCIe

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 144 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6520G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 54 votes

Rate A100 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6520G or A100 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.