GeForce4 MX 4000 vs Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics with GeForce4 MX 4000, including specs and performance data.

HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
2012
1.21
+12000%

HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics outperforms MX 4000 by a whopping 12000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10871579
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameno dataNV18 A4
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 February 2012 (13 years ago)14 December 2003 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speed400 / 700 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistorsno data29 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.000
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX118.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1
Valorant 30−35 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 30−35 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 30−35 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1
Valorant 4−5 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 6−7 0−1

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.21 0.01
Recency 8 February 2012 14 December 2003
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics has a 12000% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 MX 4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics is a notebook graphics card while GeForce4 MX 4000 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000
GeForce4 MX 4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6520G HD 7450M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 949 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics or GeForce4 MX 4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.