FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 6510G2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6510G2 with FireStream 9250, including specs and performance data.

HD 6510G2
2011
1.19

FireStream 9250 outperforms HD 6510G2 by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1101845
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.42
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameno dataRV770
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 June 2011 (14 years ago)16 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400800
Core clock speedno data625 MHz
Number of transistorsno data956 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data25.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data40
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data993 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data63.55 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1110.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Fortnite 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Valorant 30−35
−127%
75−80
+127%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Dota 2 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Fortnite 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Valorant 30−35
−127%
75−80
+127%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Dota 2 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Valorant 30−35
−127%
75−80
+127%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Valorant 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Valorant 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.19 2.78
Recency 14 June 2011 16 June 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm

HD 6510G2 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

FireStream 9250, on the other hand, has a 133.6% higher aggregate performance score.

The FireStream 9250 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6510G2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6510G2 is a notebook graphics card while FireStream 9250 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6510G2
Radeon HD 6510G2
AMD FireStream 9250
FireStream 9250

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6510G2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6510G2 or FireStream 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.