GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs Radeon HD 6470M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6470M and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6470M
2011
512 MB DDR3
0.51

1650 Max-Q outperforms HD 6470M by a whopping 2690% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1271383
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data38.36
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameSeymourTU117
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2011 (14 years ago)23 April 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$569.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1601024
Core clock speed700 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1125 MHz
Number of transistors370 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt
Texture fill rate5.60072.00
Floating-point processing power0.224 TFLOPS2.304 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
L1 Cache16 KB1 MB
L2 Cache128 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1751 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s112.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 6470M 0.51
GTX 1650 Max-Q 14.23
+2690%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6470M 225
Samples: 2053
GTX 1650 Max-Q 6293
+2697%
Samples: 1915

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6470M 535
GTX 1650 Max-Q 11083
+1971%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6470M 1706
GTX 1650 Max-Q 30957
+1715%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p10
−2600%
270−280
+2600%
Full HD13
−362%
60
+362%
1440p1−2
−2900%
30
+2900%
4K0−118

Cost per frame, $

1080p43.85no data
1440p569.99no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3100%
30−35
+3100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−460%
27−30
+460%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3100%
30−35
+3100%
Far Cry 5 0−1 38
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1380%
74
+1380%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−460%
27−30
+460%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−963%
85
+963%
Valorant 27−30
−346%
120−130
+346%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−882%
167
+882%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3100%
30−35
+3100%
Dota 2 10−12
−755%
94
+755%
Far Cry 5 0−1 35
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1280%
69
+1280%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−460%
27−30
+460%
Metro Exodus 0−1 28
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−788%
71
+788%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−960%
53
+960%
Valorant 27−30
−346%
120−130
+346%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3100%
30−35
+3100%
Dota 2 10−12
−700%
88
+700%
Far Cry 5 0−1 33
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1000%
55
+1000%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−460%
27−30
+460%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−563%
53
+563%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−500%
30
+500%
Valorant 27−30
−346%
120−130
+346%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−5550%
110−120
+5550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 36

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−86.7%
27−30
+86.7%
Valorant 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−750%
17
+750%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−450%
11
+450%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 64
+0%
64
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Fortnite 138
+0%
138
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 54
+0%
54
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Fortnite 80
+0%
80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 56
+0%
56
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 49
+0%
49
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 59
+0%
59
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 16
+0%
16
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 10
+0%
10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+0%
18
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how HD 6470M and GTX 1650 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 2600% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 362% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 2900% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 Max-Q is 5550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Max-Q performs better in 31 tests (52%)
  • there's a draw in 29 tests (48%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.51 14.23
Recency 4 January 2011 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm

GTX 1650 Max-Q has a 2690.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6470M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6470M
Radeon HD 6470M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 160 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6470M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 706 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6470M or GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.