Arc A580 vs Radeon HD 6470M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6470M with Arc A580, including specs and performance data.

HD 6470M
2011
512 MB DDR3
0.59

Arc A580 outperforms HD 6470M by a whopping 5017% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1202184
Place by popularitynot in top-10082
Power efficiencyno data11.94
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameSeymourDG2-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)10 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$569.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1603072
Core clock speed700 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors370 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data175 Watt
Texture fill rate5.600384.0
Floating-point processing power0.224 TFLOPS12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6470M 0.59
Arc A580 30.19
+5017%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6470M 227
Arc A580 11647
+5031%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6470M 535
Arc A580 35210
+6481%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6470M 1706
Arc A580 95677
+5508%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p10
−4900%
500−550
+4900%
Full HD13
−708%
105
+708%
1440p1−2
−5400%
55
+5400%
4K0−133

Cost per frame, $

1080p43.85no data
1440p569.99no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2475%
103
+2475%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2700%
80−85
+2700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−10100%
100−110
+10100%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1680%
85−90
+1680%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−1455%
170−180
+1455%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2467%
150−160
+2467%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−340%
130−140
+340%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2450%
102
+2450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2700%
80−85
+2700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−10100%
100−110
+10100%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1680%
85−90
+1680%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−1455%
170−180
+1455%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−3467%
214
+3467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−760%
85−90
+760%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−340%
130−140
+340%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1500%
64
+1500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2700%
80−85
+2700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1680%
85−90
+1680%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−891%
109
+891%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2850%
177
+2850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−580%
68
+580%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−100%
60
+100%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−6300%
60−65
+6300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 54
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4700%
45−50
+4700%
Hitman 3 6−7
−817%
55−60
+817%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−2800%
87
+2800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−19700%
190−200
+19700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2300%
70−75
+2300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3400%
35
+3400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 30

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85
+0%
85
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 73
+0%
73
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 64
+0%
64
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 87
+0%
87
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 51
+0%
51
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 91
+0%
91
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130
+0%
130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+0%
55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hitman 3 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
+0%
61
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 56
+0%
56
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73
+0%
73
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27
+0%
27
+0%

This is how HD 6470M and Arc A580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A580 is 4900% faster in 900p
  • Arc A580 is 708% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A580 is 5400% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A580 is 19700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A580 is ahead in 30 tests (47%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (53%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.59 30.19
Recency 4 January 2011 10 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm

Arc A580 has a 5016.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6470M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6470M is a notebook card while Arc A580 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6470M
Radeon HD 6470M
Intel Arc A580
Arc A580

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 139 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6470M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 252 votes

Rate Arc A580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.