GeForce FX 5900 Ultra vs Radeon HD 6450M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6450M with GeForce FX 5900 Ultra, including specs and performance data.

HD 6450M
2011
1 GB DDR3
0.57
+533%

HD 6450M outperforms 5900 Ultra by a whopping 533% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12571511
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.12
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameSeymourNV35
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2011 (14 years ago)23 October 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160no data
Core clock speed600 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors370 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data59 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8003.600
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs88
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Lengthno data218 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz425 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s27.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0a
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
+700%
1−2
−700%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data499.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Valorant 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
Valorant 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
Valorant 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Valorant 3−4 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

This is how HD 6450M and FX 5900 Ultra compete in popular games:

  • HD 6450M is 700% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 0.09
Recency 4 January 2011 23 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm

HD 6450M has a 533.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 6450M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5900 Ultra in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6450M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5900 Ultra is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6450M
Radeon HD 6450M
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra
GeForce FX 5900 Ultra

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6450M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 7 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5900 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6450M or GeForce FX 5900 Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.