UHD Graphics 730 vs Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 and UHD Graphics 730, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6450 GDDR5
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 27 Watt
0.89

Graphics 730 outperforms HD 6450 GDDR5 by a whopping 330% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1191758
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.5419.66
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameCaicosRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 April 2011 (15 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160192
Core clock speed750 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data18.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5952 TFLOPS
ROPsno data6
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p7
−329%
30−35
+329%
Full HD15
−300%
60−65
+300%
1200p5
−320%
21−24
+320%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Fortnite 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Valorant 30−33
−300%
120−130
+300%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 29
−314%
120−130
+314%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Dota 2 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Fortnite 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Valorant 30−33
−300%
120−130
+300%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Dota 2 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Valorant 30−33
−300%
120−130
+300%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Valorant 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

This is how HD 6450 GDDR5 and UHD Graphics 730 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 730 is 329% faster in 900p
  • UHD Graphics 730 is 300% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 730 is 320% faster in 1200p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.89 3.83
Recency 18 April 2011 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 has a 330% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 730 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 27 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1612 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 or UHD Graphics 730, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.