ATI Radeon 9200 LE vs HD 6380G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13051603
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.06no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameSuperSumoRV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 June 2011 (14 years ago)1 May 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160no data
Core clock speed400 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate3.2001.000
Floating-point processing power0.128 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6380G 200
+9900%
Samples: 111
ATI 9200 LE 2
Samples: 13

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
Metro Exodus 0−1 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 no data

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 2−3 no data

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2011 1 May 2003
Chip lithography 32 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

HD 6380G has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 369% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 LE, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6380G and Radeon 9200 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6380G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9200 LE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 39 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6380G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6380G or Radeon 9200 LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.