Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Radeon HD 6380G
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 6380G and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) outperforms HD 6380G by a whopping 940% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1224 | 608 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 1.03 | 14.96 |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
GPU code name | SuperSumo | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 14 June 2011 (13 years ago) | 28 May 2019 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399.99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 160 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1100 MHz |
Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 12-25 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 3.200 | no data |
Floating-point processing power | 0.128 TFLOPS | no data |
ROPs | 4 | no data |
TMUs | 8 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | System Shared | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | no data |
Memory bus width | System Shared | no data |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | no data |
Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
Vulkan | N/A | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 1−2
−1600%
| 17
+1600%
|
Cost per frame, $
1080p | 399.99 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−200%
|
9−10
+200%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−275%
|
14−16
+275%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−200%
|
9−10
+200%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−800%
|
9
+800%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−140%
|
12−14
+140%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
−250%
|
35−40
+250%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−233%
|
20−22
+233%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−83.3%
|
55
+83.3%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−275%
|
14−16
+275%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−200%
|
9−10
+200%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−300%
|
4
+300%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−140%
|
12−14
+140%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
−250%
|
35−40
+250%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−183%
|
17
+183%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−90%
|
18−20
+90%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−70%
|
51
+70%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−275%
|
14−16
+275%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−200%
|
9−10
+200%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−140%
|
12−14
+140%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
−10%
|
11
+10%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−150%
|
15
+150%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9
−11.1%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−60%
|
45−50
+60%
|
1440p
High Preset
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−700%
|
8−9
+700%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 5−6 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 6−7 |
Hitman 3 | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−233%
|
10−11
+233%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−200%
|
6−7
+200%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12
+0%
|
12
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12
+0%
|
12
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 11
+0%
|
11
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9
+0%
|
9
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
This is how HD 6380G and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compete in popular games:
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 1600% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 6380G is 11% faster.
- in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 3400% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- HD 6380G is ahead in 1 test (2%)
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is ahead in 33 tests (50%)
- there's a draw in 32 tests (48%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.52 | 5.41 |
Recency | 14 June 2011 | 28 May 2019 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 12 Watt |
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) has a 940.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 191.7% lower power consumption.
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6380G in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.