Arc A380 vs Radeon HD 6380G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6380G with Arc A380, including specs and performance data.

HD 6380G
2011
35 Watt
0.50

Arc A380 outperforms HD 6380G by a whopping 3022% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1249348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0144.10
Power efficiency1.0114.73
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameSuperSumoDG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399.99 $149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Arc A380 has 440900% better value for money than HD 6380G.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1601024
Core clock speed400 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200131.2
Floating-point processing power0.128 TFLOPS4.198 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data222 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1937 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data186.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 6380G 0.50
Arc A380 15.61
+3022%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6380G 200
Arc A380 6240
+3020%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−4600%
47
+4600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p399.99
−12517%
3.17
+12517%
  • Arc A380 has 12517% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4000%
41
+4000%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−475%
23
+475%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3200%
33
+3200%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1800%
76
+1800%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−350%
18
+350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−700%
55−60
+700%
Valorant 27−30
−359%
120−130
+359%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−1156%
200−210
+1156%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2800%
29
+2800%
Dota 2 10−12
−2627%
300−310
+2627%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1700%
72
+1700%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−225%
13
+225%
Metro Exodus 0−1 40
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−700%
55−60
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1220%
66
+1220%
Valorant 27−30
−359%
120−130
+359%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2500%
26
+2500%
Dota 2 10−12
−2627%
300−310
+2627%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1325%
57
+1325%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−75%
7
+75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−700%
55−60
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−580%
34
+580%
Valorant 27−30
−359%
120−130
+359%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−11100%
110−120
+11100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−5033%
150−160
+5033%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 14−16
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1000%
30−35
+1000%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−3700%
35−40
+3700%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%
Fortnite 0−1 30−35
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−86.7%
27−30
+86.7%
Valorant 3−4
−2700%
80−85
+2700%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Fortnite 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Counter-Strike 2 183
+0%
183
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 122
+0%
122
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 72
+0%
72
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 57
+0%
57
+0%
Far Cry 5 57
+0%
57
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 64
+0%
64
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 33
+0%
33
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how HD 6380G and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A380 is 4600% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A380 is 11100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A380 is ahead in 31 test (52%)
  • there's a draw in 29 tests (48%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.50 15.61
Recency 14 June 2011 14 June 2022
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 75 Watt

HD 6380G has 114.3% lower power consumption.

Arc A380, on the other hand, has a 3022% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 433.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6380G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6380G is a notebook card while Arc A380 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6380G
Radeon HD 6380G
Intel Arc A380
Arc A380

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5
38 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6380G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5
887 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6380G or Arc A380, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.