Radeon RX 7600M vs HD 6370M

Place in performance ranking	1128	408
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.01	no data
Architecture	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	Robson XT	Navi 33
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	26 November 2010 (13 years ago)	5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price	$338	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	1792
Core clock speed	750 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	2070 MHz
Number of transistors	292 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	11 Watt	90 Watt (50 - 90 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	6.000	246.4
Floating-point performance	120 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 6370M and Radeon RX 7600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	12.8 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.7
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6370M 0.71

RX 7600M 10.18
+1334%

RX 7600M outperforms HD 6370M by 1334% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 6370M 275

RX 7600M 3940
+1333%

RX 7600M outperforms HD 6370M by 1333% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−433%

16−18
+433%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −467%	16−18 +467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −267%	21−24 +267%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −1400%	14−16 +1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −467%	16−18 +467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −267%	21−24 +267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −600%	21−24 +600%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −600%	21−24 +600%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −400%	14−16 +400%
Hitman 3	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −225%	12−14 +225%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Hitman 3	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7600M is 1500% faster than the HD 6370M.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 7600M surpassed HD 6370M in all 25 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.71	10.18
Recency	26 November 2010	5 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	11 Watt	90 Watt