Radeon RX 6600 vs HD 6370M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6370M with Radeon RX 6600, including specs and performance data.

HD 6370M
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 11 Watt
0.70

RX 6600 outperforms HD 6370M by a whopping 5391% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1178118
Place by popularitynot in top-10014
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data65.77
Power efficiency4.4720.45
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRobsonNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 November 2010 (14 years ago)13 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores801792
Core clock speed750 MHz1626 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2491 MHz
Number of transistors292 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt132 Watt
Texture fill rate6.000279.0
Floating-point processing power0.12 TFLOPS8.928 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 6370M 0.70
RX 6600 38.44
+5391%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6370M 275
RX 6600 15125
+5400%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6370M 1319
RX 6600 94734
+7082%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−5450%
111
+5450%
1440p1−2
−5500%
56
+5500%
4K0−130

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.96
1440pno data5.88
4Kno data10.97

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−8350%
169
+8350%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1486%
111
+1486%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5250%
107
+5250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−5900%
120
+5900%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1100%
84
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4450%
91
+4450%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3425%
140−150
+3425%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1713%
140−150
+1713%
Valorant 27−30
−645%
210−220
+645%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−3400%
70
+3400%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−871%
68
+871%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−1358%
270−280
+1358%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3550%
73
+3550%
Dota 2 12−14
−1150%
150
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3425%
140−150
+3425%
Metro Exodus 0−1 82
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1713%
140−150
+1713%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−3575%
147
+3575%
Valorant 27−30
−645%
210−220
+645%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−743%
59
+743%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2850%
59
+2850%
Dota 2 12−14
−792%
107
+792%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3425%
140−150
+3425%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1713%
140−150
+1713%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2150%
90
+2150%
Valorant 27−30
−645%
210−220
+645%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 30−33
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−8233%
250−260
+8233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−4275%
170−180
+4275%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 34
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−5050%
100−110
+5050%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6700%
65−70
+6700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−9400%
95−100
+9400%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−300%
60
+300%
Valorant 4−5
−5450%
220−230
+5450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−4300%
44
+4300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2250%
45−50
+2250%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2200%
45−50
+2200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 154
+0%
154
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 123
+0%
123
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 142
+0%
142
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 137
+0%
137
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 134
+0%
134
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85
+0%
85
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 64
+0%
64
+0%
Metro Exodus 48
+0%
48
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 91
+0%
91
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 29
+0%
29
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+0%
44
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Dota 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 29
+0%
29
+0%

This is how HD 6370M and RX 6600 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 is 5450% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 is 5500% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1440p resolution and the Epic Preset, the RX 6600 is 9400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6600 is ahead in 36 tests (56%)
  • there's a draw in 28 tests (44%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 38.44
Recency 26 November 2010 13 October 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 132 Watt

HD 6370M has 1100% lower power consumption.

RX 6600, on the other hand, has a 5391.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6370M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6370M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6600 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6370M
Radeon HD 6370M
AMD Radeon RX 6600
Radeon RX 6600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 136 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 10457 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6370M or Radeon RX 6600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.