UHD Graphics 770 vs Radeon HD 6290

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6290 and UHD Graphics 770, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6290
2011
1 GB GDDR3, 19 Watt
0.27

UHD Graphics 770 outperforms HD 6290 by a whopping 2185% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1354586
Place by popularitynot in top-10031
Power efficiency0.9828.32
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameCedarRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 December 2011 (13 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80256
Core clock speed650 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors292 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate5.20026.40
Floating-point processing power0.104 TFLOPS0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMIMotherboard Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6290 0.27
UHD Graphics 770 6.17
+2185%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6290 104
UHD Graphics 770 1016
+877%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6290 179
UHD Graphics 770 16443
+9086%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6290 497
UHD Graphics 770 2655
+434%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6
−217%
19
+217%
4K0−114

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−360%
23
+360%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+50%
6
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−400%
30
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−260%
18
+260%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−750%
50−55
+750%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
World of Tanks 12−14
−708%
95−100
+708%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−220%
16
+220%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−750%
50−55
+750%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−3600%
35−40
+3600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 5−6
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Valorant 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Dota 2 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 18−20
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 5−6
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+7.1%
14
−7.1%
Valorant 0−1 6−7

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 16
+0%
16
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+0%
9
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
World of Tanks 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how HD 6290 and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 770 is 217% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 6290 is 50% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 3600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6290 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • UHD Graphics 770 is ahead in 28 tests (47%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 6.17
Recency 4 December 2011 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has a 2185.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 26.7% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6290 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6290
Radeon HD 6290
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 46 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1288 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.