GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs Radeon HD 6250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1414not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.88no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameCedarGT200B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date31 January 2011 (14 years ago)23 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80192
Core clock speed650 MHz576 MHz
Number of transistors292 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt182 Watt
Texture fill rate5.20036.86
Floating-point processing power0.104 TFLOPS0.4769 TFLOPS
ROPs428
TMUs864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB896 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz999 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s111.9 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2011 23 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 896 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 182 Watt

HD 6250 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 857.9% lower power consumption.

GTX 260 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has a 75% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6250 and GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6250
Radeon HD 6250
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 90 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6250 or GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.