GeForce 9200 vs Radeon HD 6230

Place in the ranking	1238	1244
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.66	0.75
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	Park	C79
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	2 July 2011 (13 years ago)	17 April 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	16
Core clock speed	650 MHz	450 MHz
Number of transistors	292 million	314 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	19 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	5.200	3.600
Floating-point processing power	0.104 TFLOPS	0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	4
TMUs	8	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCI
Length	168 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR2	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	667 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	10.67 GB/s	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.0	4.0
OpenGL	4.4	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6230 0.46
+4.5%

GeForce 9200 0.44

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6230 179
+5.9%

GeForce 9200 169

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.46	0.44
Recency	2 July 2011	17 April 2007
Chip lithography	40 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	19 Watt	40 Watt

HD 6230 has a 4.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 110.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 6230 and GeForce 9200.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.