GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon HD 5830

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5830 and GeForce RTX 3070, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 5830
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 175 Watt
4.49

RTX 3070 outperforms ATI HD 5830 by a whopping 1191% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking62331
Place by popularitynot in top-10046
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.4725.95
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameCypressAmpere GA104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 February 2010 (14 years ago)16 September 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499
Current price$11.97 $662 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3070 has 5421% better value for money than ATI HD 5830.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11205888
Core clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1725 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate44.80317.4
Floating-point performance1,792.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length282 mm242 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDAno data8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5830 4.49
RTX 3070 57.97
+1191%

GeForce RTX 3070 outperforms Radeon HD 5830 by 1191% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 5830 1733
RTX 3070 22387
+1192%

GeForce RTX 3070 outperforms Radeon HD 5830 by 1192% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

ATI HD 5830 1930
RTX 3070 31020
+1507%

GeForce RTX 3070 outperforms Radeon HD 5830 by 1507% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−1350%
145
+1350%
1440p7−8
−1314%
99
+1314%
4K4−5
−1500%
64
+1500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 147
−1159%
1850−1900
+1159%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 125
−1180%
1600−1650
+1180%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100
−1150%
1250−1300
+1150%
Battlefield 5 180−190
−1177%
2350−2400
+1177%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−1184%
1400−1450
+1184%
Cyberpunk 2077 139
−1159%
1750−1800
+1159%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−1173%
1400−1450
+1173%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
−1186%
1800−1850
+1186%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−1183%
2450−2500
+1183%
Hitman 3 109
−1184%
1400−1450
+1184%
Horizon Zero Dawn 288
−1185%
3700−3750
+1185%
Metro Exodus 144
−1185%
1850−1900
+1185%
Red Dead Redemption 2 118
−1171%
1500−1550
+1171%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 311
−1186%
4000−4050
+1186%
Watch Dogs: Legion 121
−1181%
1550−1600
+1181%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 107
−1162%
1350−1400
+1162%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 87
−1164%
1100−1150
+1164%
Battlefield 5 180−190
−1177%
2350−2400
+1177%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−1184%
1400−1450
+1184%
Cyberpunk 2077 126
−1170%
1600−1650
+1170%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−1173%
1400−1450
+1173%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
−1186%
1800−1850
+1186%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−1183%
2450−2500
+1183%
Hitman 3 100
−1150%
1250−1300
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 240−250
−1181%
3100−3150
+1181%
Metro Exodus 133
−1178%
1700−1750
+1178%
Red Dead Redemption 2 117
−1182%
1500−1550
+1182%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 255
−1175%
3250−3300
+1175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 230
−1183%
2950−3000
+1183%
Watch Dogs: Legion 178
−1164%
2250−2300
+1164%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 81
−1135%
1000−1050
+1135%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
−1182%
1000−1050
+1182%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−1184%
1400−1450
+1184%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
−1175%
1300−1350
+1175%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−1173%
1400−1450
+1173%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−1183%
2450−2500
+1183%
Horizon Zero Dawn 181
−1171%
2300−2350
+1171%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 223
−1178%
2850−2900
+1178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 121
−1181%
1550−1600
+1181%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85
−1135%
1050−1100
+1135%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 116
−1150%
1450−1500
+1150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
−1180%
1600−1650
+1180%
Far Cry New Dawn 144
−1185%
1850−1900
+1185%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 68
−1150%
850−900
+1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65
−1131%
800−850
+1131%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
−1150%
1150−1200
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
−1190%
800−850
+1190%
Far Cry 5 119
−1161%
1500−1550
+1161%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−1160%
1650−1700
+1160%
Hitman 3 96
−1150%
1200−1250
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 146
−1167%
1850−1900
+1167%
Metro Exodus 101
−1187%
1300−1350
+1187%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 166
−1165%
2100−2150
+1165%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
−1176%
1250−1300
+1176%
Watch Dogs: Legion 66
−1188%
850−900
+1188%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 114
−1172%
1450−1500
+1172%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−1131%
800−850
+1131%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−1173%
700−750
+1173%
Hitman 3 52
−1150%
650−700
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−1165%
1050−1100
+1165%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 62
−1190%
800−850
+1190%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
−1178%
1150−1200
+1178%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
−1150%
600−650
+1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 43
−1179%
550−600
+1179%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−1120%
500−550
+1120%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
−1067%
350−400
+1067%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−1084%
450−500
+1084%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−1136%
1100−1150
+1136%
Horizon Zero Dawn 89
−1136%
1100−1150
+1136%
Metro Exodus 71
−1168%
900−950
+1168%
Watch Dogs: Legion 38
−1084%
450−500
+1084%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 69
−1132%
850−900
+1132%

This is how ATI HD 5830 and RTX 3070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 is 1350% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 is 1314% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 is 1500% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.49 57.97
Recency 25 February 2010 16 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 220 Watt

The GeForce RTX 3070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5830 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5830
Radeon HD 5830
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 73 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 9912 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.