GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5830

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5830 and GeForce GTX 460 OEM, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 5830
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 175 Watt
4.08
+47.3%

HD 5830 outperforms 460 OEM by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking723830
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.811.43
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameCypressGF104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 February 2010 (15 years ago)11 October 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1120336
Core clock speed800 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate44.8036.40
Floating-point processing power1.792 TFLOPS0.8736 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs5656
L1 Cache112 KB448 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length282 mm210 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz850 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s108.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.08 2.77
Recency 25 February 2010 11 October 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 150 Watt

ATI HD 5830 has a 47.3% higher aggregate performance score.

GTX 460 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 5830 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 OEM in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5830
Radeon HD 5830
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GeForce GTX 460 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 79 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 19 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 5830 or GeForce GTX 460 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.