Radeon HD 8750M vs ATI HD 5770

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5770 with Radeon HD 8750M, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 5770
2009
1 GB GDDR5, 108 Watt
4.33
+67.2%

ATI HD 5770 outperforms HD 8750M by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking674824
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.88no data
Power efficiency2.82no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameJuniperMars
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 October 2009 (15 years ago)26 February 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800384
Core clock speed850 MHz670 MHz
Boost clock speedno data775 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Wattno data
Texture fill rate34.0016.08
Floating-point processing power1.36 TFLOPS0.5146 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length208 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.06.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 5770 4.33
+67.2%
HD 8750M 2.59

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5770 1705
+67.5%
HD 8750M 1018

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

ATI HD 5770 2410
+41.9%
HD 8750M 1698

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI HD 5770 11699
+71%
HD 8750M 6840

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p24
+4.3%
23
−4.3%
Full HD50
+150%
20
−150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.18no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Fortnite 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Valorant 55−60
+27.9%
40−45
−27.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+37%
54
−37%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Dota 2 35−40
+48%
24−27
−48%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Fortnite 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Valorant 55−60
+27.9%
40−45
−27.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Dota 2 35−40
+48%
24−27
−48%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Valorant 55−60
+27.9%
40−45
−27.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Valorant 45−50
+105%
21−24
−105%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

This is how ATI HD 5770 and HD 8750M compete in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5770 is 4% faster in 900p
  • ATI HD 5770 is 150% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI HD 5770 is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5770 is ahead in 58 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.33 2.59
Recency 13 October 2009 26 February 2013
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

ATI HD 5770 has a 67.2% higher aggregate performance score.

HD 8750M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 5770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8750M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5770 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 8750M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5770
Radeon HD 5770
AMD Radeon HD 8750M
Radeon HD 8750M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 683 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 213 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 5770 or Radeon HD 8750M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.