GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 5770

Place in the ranking	673	245
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.86	no data
Power efficiency	2.82	13.54
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Juniper	GP106
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	13 October 2009 (15 years ago)	26 December 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$159	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	800	1280
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1506 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1709 MHz
Number of transistors	1,040 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	34.00	136.7
Floating-point processing power	1.36 TFLOPS	4.375 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	40
TMUs	40	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	208 mm	250 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	5 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	4800 MHz	2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	160.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5770 4.25

GTX 1060 5 GB 22.68
+434%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5770 1705

GTX 1060 5 GB 9091
+433%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	24 −400%	120−130 +400%
Full HD	49 −431%	260−270 +431%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

3.24

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −400%	60−65 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −400%	65−70 +400%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −400%	60−65 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −426%	100−105 +426%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −400%	70−75 +400%
Valorant	10−12 −400%	55−60 +400%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −400%	65−70 +400%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −400%	60−65 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
Dota 2	14−16 −400%	70−75 +400%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −400%	110−120 +400%
Fortnite	24−27 −400%	130−140 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −426%	100−105 +426%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −400%	70−75 +400%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −426%	200−210 +426%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −400%	70−75 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −433%	80−85 +433%
Valorant	10−12 −400%	55−60 +400%
World of Tanks	70−75 −373%	350−400 +373%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −400%	65−70 +400%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −400%	60−65 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
Dota 2	14−16 −400%	70−75 +400%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −400%	110−120 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −426%	100−105 +426%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −426%	200−210 +426%
Valorant	10−12 −400%	55−60 +400%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Grand Theft Auto V	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−33 −433%	160−170 +433%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
World of Tanks	30−35 −431%	170−180 +431%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Valorant	12−14 −400%	65−70 +400%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −431%	85−90 +431%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −431%	85−90 +431%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −400%	65−70 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −431%	85−90 +431%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Dota 2	16−18 −431%	85−90 +431%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Fortnite	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Valorant	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%

This is how ATI HD 5770 and GTX 1060 5 GB compete in popular games:

GTX 1060 5 GB is 400% faster in 900p
GTX 1060 5 GB is 431% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.25	22.68
Recency	13 October 2009	26 December 2017
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	5 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	120 Watt

ATI HD 5770 has 11.1% lower power consumption.

GTX 1060 5 GB, on the other hand, has a 433.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5770 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.