GeForce 820A vs Radeon HD 5770

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

ATI HD 5770
2009
1024 MB GDDR5
4.41
+208%

Radeon HD 5770 outperforms GeForce 820A by a whopping 208% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking625947
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.670.02
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameJuniperGF117
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date13 October 2009 (14 years ago)17 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data
Current price$103 (0.6x MSRP)$238

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

ATI HD 5770 has 3250% better value for money than GeForce 820A.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80096
Core clock speed850 MHz775 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate34.0012.40
Floating-point performance1,360.0 gflops297.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length208 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDAno data2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5770 4.41
+208%
GeForce 820A 1.43

Radeon HD 5770 outperforms GeForce 820A by 208% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 5770 1705
+207%
GeForce 820A 555

Radeon HD 5770 outperforms GeForce 820A by 207% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p24
+243%
7−8
−243%
Full HD50
+213%
16−18
−213%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Battlefield 5 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Hitman 3 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Battlefield 5 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Hitman 3 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Battlefield 5 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Hitman 3 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Hitman 3 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1

This is how ATI HD 5770 and GeForce 820A compete in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5770 is 243% faster in 900p
  • ATI HD 5770 is 213% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.41 1.43
Recency 13 October 2009 17 March 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 15 Watt

The Radeon HD 5770 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 820A in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5770
Radeon HD 5770
NVIDIA GeForce 820A
GeForce 820A

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 631 vote

Rate Radeon HD 5770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 42 votes

Rate GeForce 820A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.