Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon HD 5750

Place in performance ranking	739	259
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.16	no data
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Juniper	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	13 October 2009 (14 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price	$189	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	720	1024
Core clock speed	700 MHz	855 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	1,040 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	86 Watt	95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	25.20	91.20
Floating-point performance	1,008.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 5750 and Quadro T1200 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	178 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz	10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	73.6 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.6
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5750 3.01

T1200 Mobile 19.95
+563%

Quadro T1200 Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 5750 by 563% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

ATI HD 5750 1370

T1200 Mobile 10134
+640%

Quadro T1200 Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 5750 by 640% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	8−9 −625%	58 +625%
1440p	4−5 −725%	33 +725%
4K	12−14 −575%	81 +575%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
−700%

30−35

+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −680%	35−40 +680%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −571%	47 +571%
Battlefield 5	9−10 −622%	65−70 +622%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −567%	40−45 +567%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −700%	30−35 +700%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −622%	65 +622%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −657%	50−55 +657%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −658%	90−95 +658%
Hitman 3	5−6 −680%	35−40 +680%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −567%	60 +567%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −588%	55−60 +588%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −638%	59 +638%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −575%	54 +575%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −680%	35−40 +680%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −600%	28 +600%
Battlefield 5	9−10 −622%	65−70 +622%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −567%	40−45 +567%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −700%	30−35 +700%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −638%	59 +638%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −657%	50−55 +657%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −658%	90−95 +658%
Hitman 3	5−6 −680%	35−40 +680%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −571%	47 +571%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −633%	65−70 +633%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −588%	55−60 +588%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −633%	44 +633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −610%	71 +610%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −571%	47 +571%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −680%	35−40 +680%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −600%	21 +600%
Battlefield 5	9−10 −622%	65−70 +622%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −700%	30−35 +700%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −600%	56 +600%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −657%	50−55 +657%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −658%	90−95 +658%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −640%	37 +640%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −850%	19 +850%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −767%	24−27 +767%
Hitman 3	3−4 −667%	21−24 +667%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −700%	32 +700%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −640%	35−40 +640%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −725%	30−35 +725%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −583%	40−45 +583%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −667%	21−24 +667%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −567%	20−22 +567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −800%	18 +800%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −660%	35−40 +660%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −583%	41 +583%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −567%	40−45 +567%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −680%	35−40 +680%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −1100%	12 +1100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Hitman 3	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −633%	21−24 +633%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −850%	18−20 +850%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −750%	16−18 +750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −567%	20−22 +567%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −567%	20−22 +567%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	4−5
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −575%	27−30 +575%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%

This is how ATI HD 5750 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

T1200 Mobile is 625% faster in 1080p
T1200 Mobile is 725% faster in 1440p
T1200 Mobile is 575% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.01	19.95
Recency	13 October 2009	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	86 Watt	95 Watt