HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) vs ATI Radeon HD 5670

Place in the ranking	878	1243
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.26	no data
Power efficiency	2.25	no data
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Gen. 8 (2015−2016)
GPU code name	Redwood	Braswell
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	14 January 2010 (15 years ago)	1 April 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$119	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	12
Core clock speed	775 MHz	320 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	640 MHz
Number of transistors	627 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	64 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	15.50	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.62 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	8	no data
TMUs	20	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	no data
Length	168 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	no data
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	11.2
Shader Model	5.0	no data
OpenGL	4.4	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5670 2.09
+364%

HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) 0.45

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

ATI HD 5670 1468
+321%

HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) 349

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	26 +420%	5−6 −420%
Full HD	32 +433%	6 −433%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

3.72

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Elden Ring	3−4	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Metro Exodus	2−3	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Dota 2	4−5	0−1
Elden Ring	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	12−14 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
Fortnite	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	4−5	0−1
Metro Exodus	2−3	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 +186%	7−8 −186%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
World of Tanks	40−45 +167%	14−16 −167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Dota 2	4−5	0−1
Far Cry 5	12−14 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 +186%	7−8 −186%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring	1−2	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1
World of Tanks	12−14	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Valorant	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Elden Ring	1−2	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Fortnite	0−1	0−1
Valorant	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%