Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs ATI Radeon HD 5570

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5570 with Qualcomm Adreno 680, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 5570
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 39 Watt
1.13

Qualcomm Adreno 680 outperforms ATI HD 5570 by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1094901
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.2122.73
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)no data
GPU code nameRedwoodno data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 February 2010 (15 years ago)6 December 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400no data
Core clock speed650 MHzno data
Number of transistors627 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)39 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate13.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.52 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs20no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length165 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 5570 1.13
Qualcomm Adreno 680 2.09
+85%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5570 478
Qualcomm Adreno 680 886
+85.4%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

ATI HD 5570 1025
Qualcomm Adreno 680 1936
+88.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p15
−80%
27−30
+80%
Full HD23
−73.9%
40−45
+73.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Fortnite 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Valorant 30−35
−21.9%
35−40
+21.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−59.3%
40−45
+59.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Dota 2 16−18
−43.8%
21−24
+43.8%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Fortnite 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 4−5
Metro Exodus 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Valorant 30−35
−21.9%
35−40
+21.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Dota 2 16−18
−43.8%
21−24
+43.8%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Valorant 30−35
−21.9%
35−40
+21.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Valorant 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 0−1 5−6
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how ATI HD 5570 and Qualcomm Adreno 680 compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm Adreno 680 is 80% faster in 900p
  • Qualcomm Adreno 680 is 74% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Qualcomm Adreno 680 is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Qualcomm Adreno 680 is ahead in 38 tests (78%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (22%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.13 2.09
Recency 9 February 2010 6 December 2018
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 39 Watt 7 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 680 has a 85% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 457.1% lower power consumption.

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5570 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5570 is a desktop graphics card while Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5570
Radeon HD 5570
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Adreno 680

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 304 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 38 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 5570 or Qualcomm Adreno 680, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.