UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) vs ATI Radeon HD 5470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD 6250 HD 6290 HD 7350 OEM HD 7350 OEM PCI HD 7350 PCI HD 8350 OEM R5 220 OEM HD 5450 HD 5450 PCIe x1 HD 5470 HD 5490 HD 5530
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
(Jasper Lake 16 EU) (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (Jasper Lake 32 EU) G1 G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) G4 P630 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 24EUs Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5470 with UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 5470
2012
512 MB GDDR3, 19 Watt
0.64

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) outperforms ATI HD 5470 by a whopping 184% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
ATI HD 5470 HD 5470
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1226944
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.5713.87
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameCedarGen. 11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 February 2012 (13 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8032
Core clock speed650 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors292 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate5.200no data
Floating-point processing power0.104 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed400 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−300%
8
+300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
God of War 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 1
+0%
1
+0%
Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
God of War 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 12
+0%
12
+0%
Far Cry 5 1
+0%
1
+0%
Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
God of War 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2
+0%
2
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
+0%
4
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Far Cry 5 1
+0%
1
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
God of War 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
+0%
3
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
God of War 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
God of War 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how ATI HD 5470 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is 300% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 53 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.64 1.82
Recency 13 February 2012 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 4 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has a 184.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 375% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5470 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5470 is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

ATI Radeon HD 5470
Radeon HD 5470
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

ATI HD 5470 Radeon HD 5470
vs
HD Graphics 2500 HD Graphics 2500
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
vs
GeForce 920M GeForce 920M
ATI HD 5470 Radeon HD 5470
vs
7900 GT GeForce 7900 GT
RTX 5070 Ti RTX 5070 Ti
vs
HD 7670 OEM HD 7670 OEM
R7 350 640SP R7 350 640SP
vs
HD 6390 HD 6390
RTX 4070 RTX 4070
vs
HD 6570 HD 6570
RTX 4060 Ti RTX 4060 Ti
vs
HD 6670 HD 6670
ATI HD 2900 XT HD 2900 XT
vs
HD 6450 HD 6450
RTX 5070 SUPER RTX 5070 SUPER
vs
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
Pro 5500 XT Pro 5500 XT
vs
GTX 1060 3 GB GTX 1060 3 GB
RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh 2060 Max-Q Refresh
vs
GTX 950 OEM 950 OEM
RX 5700 RX 5700
vs
GTX 960 OEM GTX 960 OEM
Radeon 540X 540X
vs
GT 740 OEM GT 740 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 45 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 19 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 5470 or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.