GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs ATI Radeon HD 4890

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4810 4830 4850 4850 X2 4855 4860 4870 4870 Mac Edition 4870 X2 4890
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q MX450 25W MX450 30.5W 8Gbps MX450 30.5W 10Gbps T400 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4890 with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 4890
2009, $249
1 GB GDDR5, 190 Watt
3.69

1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms HD 4890 by a whopping 326% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
ATI HD 4890 HD 4890
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking764372
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.41no data
Power efficiency1.4924.18
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV790TU117
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 April 2009 (16 years ago)2 April 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8001024
Core clock speed850 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors959 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate34.0076.80
Floating-point processing power1.36 TFLOPS2.458 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4064
L1 Cache160 KB1 MB
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed975 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth124.8 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 4890 3.69
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 15.73
+326%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4890 1545
Samples: 1065
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 6580
+326%
Samples: 662

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−350%
54
+350%
1440p7−8
−371%
33
+371%
4K5−6
−380%
24
+380%

Cost per frame, $

1080p20.75no data
1440p35.57no data
4K49.80no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 67
+0%
67
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 31
+0%
31
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Far Cry 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
+0%
32
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 26
+0%
26
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
+0%
25
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+0%
20
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how ATI HD 4890 and GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 350% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 371% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 380% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.69 15.73
Recency 2 April 2009 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has a 326.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 358.3% more advanced lithography process, and 280% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4890 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4890 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

ATI Radeon HD 4890
Radeon HD 4890
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

ATI HD 4890 Radeon HD 4890
vs
GTX 550 Ti GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX Vega M GH Radeon RX Vega M GH
ATI HD 4890 Radeon HD 4890
vs
HD 6790 Radeon HD 6790
ATI HD 4890 HD 4890
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Max-Q
ATI HD 4890 HD 4890
vs
GTX 1660 Max-Q GTX 1660 Max-Q
ATI HD 4890 HD 4890
vs
GTX 1660 Mobile GTX 1660 Mobile
ATI HD 4890 HD 4890
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
ATI HD 4890 HD 4890
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
ATI HD 4890 HD 4890
vs
GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh
ATI HD 4890 HD 4890
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
ATI HD 4890 HD 4890
vs
RTX 4090 RTX 4090
ATI HD 4830 HD 4830
vs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
ATI HD 4550 HD 4550
vs
NVS 2100M NVS 2100M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 95 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4890 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 242 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4890 or GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.