GRID K200 vs ATI Radeon HD 4890

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking745not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.40no data
Power efficiency1.48no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRV790GK104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 April 2009 (16 years ago)28 June 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $235

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8001536
Core clock speed850 MHz745 MHz
Number of transistors959 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate34.0095.36
Floating-point processing power1.36 TFLOPS2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs40128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed975 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth124.8 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2009 28 June 2013
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 225 Watt

ATI HD 4890 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 18.4% lower power consumption.

GRID K200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4890 and GRID K200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4890 is a desktop graphics card while GRID K200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4890
Radeon HD 4890
NVIDIA GRID K200
GRID K200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 91 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4890 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GRID K200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4890 or GRID K200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.