GeForce 315M vs ATI Radeon HD 4860

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1403
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.48
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRV790GT218
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 September 2009 (16 years ago)5 January 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64016
Core clock speed700 MHz606 MHz
Number of transistors959 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate22.404.848
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPS0.03878 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data73
ROPs164
TMUs328
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHzUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.34.1
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 September 2009 5 January 2011
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 14 Watt

GeForce 315M has an age advantage of 1 year, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 828.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4860 and GeForce 315M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4860 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 315M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4860
Radeon HD 4860
NVIDIA GeForce 315M
GeForce 315M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 12 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4860 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 172 votes

Rate GeForce 315M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4860 or GeForce 315M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.