GeForce 910M vs ATI Radeon HD 4850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4850 with GeForce 910M, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 4850
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 110 Watt
2.45
+72.5%

ATI HD 4850 outperforms 910M by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8621018
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.23no data
Power efficiency1.703.28
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameRV770GK208B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 June 2008 (17 years ago)13 March 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800384
Core clock speed625 MHz641 MHz
Number of transistors956 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate25.0020.51
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPS0.4923 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4032
L1 Cache160 KB32 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length246 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MBDDR3 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed993 MHz1001 MHz
Memory bandwidth63.55 GB/s16.02 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boostno data2.0
Optimus-+
GameWorks-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.5
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 4850 2.45
+72.5%
GeForce 910M 1.42

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4850 Samples: 2821 1026
+72.4%
GeForce 910M Samples: 23 595

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI HD 4850 8972
+107%
GeForce 910M 4325

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

ATI HD 4850 11272
+69.9%
GeForce 910M 6636

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

ATI HD 4850 72891
+70.6%
GeForce 910M 42738

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p28
+75%
16−18
−75%
Full HD40
+344%
9
−344%
1200p19
+90%
10−12
−90%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Fortnite 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Valorant 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+60%
30
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Fortnite 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Valorant 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Valorant 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+53.3%
14−16
−53.3%
Valorant 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how ATI HD 4850 and GeForce 910M compete in popular games:

  • ATI HD 4850 is 75% faster in 900p
  • ATI HD 4850 is 344% faster in 1080p
  • ATI HD 4850 is 90% faster in 1200p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the ATI HD 4850 is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, ATI HD 4850 surpassed GeForce 910M in all 50 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.45 1.42
Recency 25 June 2008 13 March 2015
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 33 Watt

ATI HD 4850 has a 72.5% higher aggregate performance score.

GeForce 910M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 4850 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 910M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4850 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 910M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4850
Radeon HD 4850
NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GeForce 910M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 293 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 62 votes

Rate GeForce 910M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4850 or GeForce 910M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.