Radeon R5 230 vs ATI HD 4830

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4830 and Radeon R5 230, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 4830
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 95 Watt
2.17
+281%

ATI HD 4830 outperforms R5 230 by a whopping 281% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8591209
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.26no data
Power efficiency1.562.05
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameRV770Caicos
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date21 October 2008 (16 years ago)3 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$130 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640160
Core clock speed575 MHzno data
Number of transistors956 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt19 Watt
Texture fill rate18.405.000
Floating-point processing power0.736 TFLOPS0.2 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 1.0 x4
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length246 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinN/A

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s10.67 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Eyefinity-+
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+
​PowerPlayno data+
DDMA audiono data-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)DirectX® 11
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4830 2.17
+281%
R5 230 0.57

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4830 838
+279%
R5 230 221

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.17 0.57
Recency 21 October 2008 3 April 2014
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 19 Watt

ATI HD 4830 has a 280.7% higher aggregate performance score.

R5 230, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 4830 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 230 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4830
Radeon HD 4830
AMD Radeon R5 230
Radeon R5 230

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 43 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 240 votes

Rate Radeon R5 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.