ATI Radeon HD 4350 vs ATI HD 4770

Place in the ranking	924	1348
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.33	no data
Power efficiency	2.11	1.54
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	RV740	RV710
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	28 April 2009 (17 years ago)	30 September 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$109	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	80
Core clock speed	750 MHz	600 MHz
Number of transistors	826 million	242 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	20 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.00	4.800
Floating-point processing power	0.96 TFLOPS	0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	4
TMUs	32	8
L1 Cache	128 KB	16 KB
L2 Cache	128 KB	64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	203 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

2x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	4.1	4.1
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 4770 2.19
+448%

ATI HD 4350 0.40

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4770 908
+450%

Samples: 417

ATI HD 4350 165
Samples: 2158

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

35−40
+400%

−400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

3.11

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

This is how ATI HD 4770 and ATI HD 4350 compete in popular games:

ATI HD 4770 is 400% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 27 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.19	0.40
Recency	28 April 2009	30 September 2008
Chip lithography	40 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	20 Watt

ATI HD 4770 has a 448% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 4350, on the other hand, has 300% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 4770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4350 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon X800 GTO AGP

X800 PRO

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 77 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.1 233 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4770 or Radeon HD 4350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.