Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs ATI Radeon HD 4770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4700 4710 4720 4730 4730 OEM 4750 4770
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4770 with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 4770
2009, $109
512 MB GDDR5, 80 Watt
2.16

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms HD 4770 by a whopping 336% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
ATI HD 4770 HD 4770
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking907494
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.32no data
Power efficiency2.08no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameRV740Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 April 2009 (16 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6404
Core clock speed750 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1950 MHz
Number of transistors826 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Wattno data
Texture fill rate24.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.96 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length203 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12_2
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−400%
25
+400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p21.80no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how ATI HD 4770 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 400% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.16 9.42
Recency 28 April 2009 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 336.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4770 is a desktop graphics card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

ATI Radeon HD 4770
Radeon HD 4770
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

ATI HD 4770 Radeon HD 4770
vs
R7 240 Radeon R7 240
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
vs
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Arc)
ATI HD 4770 Radeon HD 4770
vs
GT 730 GeForce GT 730
ATI HD 4770 Radeon HD 4770
vs
ATI HD 5630 HD 5630
ATI HD 4770 Radeon HD 4770
vs
ATI HD 5690 HD 5690
ATI HD 4770 Radeon HD 4770
vs
ATI HD 5570 OEM HD 5570 OEM
ATI HD 4770 Radeon HD 4770
vs
ION LE ION LE
ATI HD 4770 Radeon HD 4770
vs
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 7 Cores iGPU
ATI HD 4890 Radeon HD 4890
vs
ATI HD 4100 HD 4100
ATI HD 4890 Radeon HD 4890
vs
GTX 260 Rev. 2 GTX 260 Rev. 2
ATI HD 4890 Radeon HD 4890
vs
NX-SoC NX SoC
ATI HD 4890 Radeon HD 4890
vs
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
ATI HD 4890 Radeon HD 4890
vs
ATI HD 3300 IGP HD 3300 IGP

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 75 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 17 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4770 or Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.