Tesla C2070 vs ATI Radeon HD 4730

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated579
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.41
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameRV770GF100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 June 2009 (16 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640448
Core clock speed750 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors956 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt238 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0032.14
Floating-point processing power0.96 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs3256
L1 Cache128 KB896 KB
L2 Cache128 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mm248 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz747 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s143.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 June 2009 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 238 Watt

ATI HD 4730 has 116.4% lower power consumption.

Tesla C2070, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4730 and Tesla C2070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4730 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla C2070 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4730
Radeon HD 4730
NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Tesla C2070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 27 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Tesla C2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4730 or Tesla C2070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.