ATI FireGL X3-256 vs ATI Radeon HD 4730 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameRV670R420
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date26 December 2008 (16 years ago)3 August 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,099

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed669 MHz491 MHz
Number of transistors666 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt57 Watt
Texture fill rate10.705.892
Floating-point processing power0.4282 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1612
TMUs1612
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed396 MHz454 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.34 GB/s29.06 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 December 2008 3 August 2004
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 57 Watt

ATI HD 4730 OEM has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 136.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL X3-256, on the other hand, has 93% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4730 OEM and FireGL X3-256. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4730 OEM is a desktop graphics card while FireGL X3-256 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4730 OEM
Radeon HD 4730 OEM
ATI FireGL X3-256
FireGL X3-256

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 4730 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FireGL X3-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4730 OEM or FireGL X3-256, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.