ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3 vs ATI FireGL X3-256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameR420RV670
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2004 (21 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$1,099 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data320
Core clock speed491 MHz669 MHz
Number of transistors160 million666 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)57 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rate5.89210.70
ROPs1216
TMUs1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data292 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed454 MHz1700 MBps
Memory bandwidth29.06 GB/s54.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video4x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL2.03.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 57 Watt 145 Watt

ATI FireGL X3-256 has 154% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 3850 X3, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 136% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL X3-256 and Radeon HD 3850 X3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL X3-256 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 3850 X3 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate FireGL X3-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3850 X3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL X3-256 or Radeon HD 3850 X3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.