TITAN RTX vs ATI Radeon HD 4670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4670 and TITAN RTX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 4670
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 59 Watt
0.98

TITAN RTX outperforms ATI HD 4670 by a whopping 4907% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking111464
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.012.11
Power efficiency1.1512.09
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV730TU102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 September 2008 (16 years ago)18 December 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$67 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN RTX has 21000% better value for money than ATI HD 4670.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3204608
Core clock speed750 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors514 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)59 Watt280 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00509.8
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs32288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length193 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4670 0.98
TITAN RTX 49.07
+4907%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4670 378
TITAN RTX 18858
+4889%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−5300%
162
+5300%
1440p2−3
−5050%
103
+5050%
4K1−2
−7200%
73
+7200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p22.33
−44.8%
15.43
+44.8%
1440p33.50
−38.1%
24.26
+38.1%
4K67.00
−95.7%
34.23
+95.7%
  • TITAN RTX has 45% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • TITAN RTX has 38% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • TITAN RTX has 96% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 166
+0%
166
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+0%
79
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 91
+0%
91
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 351
+0%
351
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 179
+0%
179
+0%
Metro Exodus 135
+0%
135
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Valorant 246
+0%
246
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 205
+0%
205
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120
+0%
120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+0%
86
+0%
Dota 2 153
+0%
153
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Fortnite 185
+0%
185
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 286
+0%
286
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 144
+0%
144
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 152
+0%
152
+0%
Metro Exodus 118
+0%
118
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 248
+0%
248
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 93
+0%
93
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 171
+0%
171
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80
+0%
80
+0%
Dota 2 148
+0%
148
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 242
+0%
242
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 143
+0%
143
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 192
+0%
192
+0%
Valorant 236
+0%
236
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 114
+0%
114
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 63
+0%
63
+0%
World of Tanks 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 74
+0%
74
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+0%
62
+0%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 183
+0%
183
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Metro Exodus 114
+0%
114
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 192
+0%
192
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Dota 2 134
+0%
134
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+0%
134
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 197
+0%
197
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 41
+0%
41
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 134
+0%
134
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Dota 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Fortnite 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 109
+0%
109
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Valorant 105
+0%
105
+0%

This is how ATI HD 4670 and TITAN RTX compete in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is 5300% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN RTX is 5050% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN RTX is 7200% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.98 49.07
Recency 10 September 2008 18 December 2018
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 59 Watt 280 Watt

ATI HD 4670 has 374.6% lower power consumption.

TITAN RTX, on the other hand, has a 4907.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4670 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4670
Radeon HD 4670
NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 150 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 819 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.